Democrats Celebrate Return of Suspected Human Trafficker Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Sen. Van Hollen defends Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return to face trial, emphasizing the importance of constitutional rights.

Senator Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., is hailing the return of suspected gang member Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the United States, framing the development as a victory for constitutional rights and due process. "This is not about the man, it’s about his constitutional rights," Van Hollen declared in a statement, emphasizing that the case has wider implications for the judicial process in America.
The Trump administration had faced mounting criticism for its handling of Abrego Garcia’s deportation earlier this year, with claims that federal authorities ignored Supreme Court directives by removing him to a high-security facility in El Salvador. "For months, the administration flouted the Supreme Court and our Constitution," Van Hollen stated. He credited persistent advocacy from Democratic lawmakers with securing compliance with court orders and ensuring that due process protections apply equally to all individuals, regardless of the charges against them.
Abrego Garcia, 29, now faces a sealed federal indictment in Tennessee, where he stands accused of conspiracy to unlawfully transport illegal immigrants for profit and other related offenses. Prosecutors allege that he played a central role in moving undocumented migrants from Texas to various interior states, orchestrating what they say was an organized operation spanning several years. Authorities have also repeatedly highlighted evidence suggesting his ties to MS-13, the notorious Salvadoran gang associated with violent criminal activities across North and Central America.
Additional allegations against Abrego Garcia include accusations of domestic violence, as detailed in court records filed by his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura. Despite these claims, Van Hollen and several Democratic colleagues have maintained that the core issue at stake is the protection of constitutional rights and access to a fair trial. “What I said here was these issues need to be litigated in the courts,” Van Hollen insisted when pressed about his awareness of the domestic abuse allegations prior to his visit with Abrego Garcia in El Salvador.
Democratic lawmakers have rallied around the cause, with Rep. Glenn Ivey, D-Md., also traveling to El Salvador to advocate for Abrego Garcia’s return. Ivey described the situation as “part of a much larger crisis — and we must not look away,” underscoring his belief that the case sets an important precedent for how alleged wrongful imprisonments abroad should be handled. Ivey went on to accuse the previous administration of misleading the public about their legal power to secure Abrego Garcia’s return, asserting, “Kilmar will now get his day in court. I hope he receives the fair trial he is guaranteed.”
The decision to bring Abrego Garcia back to U.S. soil has drawn fierce criticism from Republican lawmakers. Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., denounced the move in blunt terms, calling it “a waste of hard-earned taxpayer dollars” and arguing that resources should not be used to house and prosecute individuals who have already been deported. Harris’s response highlights the deep partisan divide over immigration enforcement and the application of constitutional safeguards to non-citizens facing serious charges.
Several other Democratic representatives, including Yassamin Ansari, Maxine Dexter, Maxwell Frost, and Robert Garcia, have reportedly traveled to meet with Abrego Garcia while he was imprisoned in El Salvador, signaling the high level of political attention the case has attracted. As Abrego Garcia faces legal proceedings in the United States, the controversy surrounding his case is likely to remain at the center of national debates about immigration, due process, and the reach of constitutional protections.