PBS Sues Trump Administration Over Executive Order to Cut Funding in First Legal Challenge
PBS sues Trump over funding cut, calling it an unconstitutional attack on public television


The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) launched a legal challenge against President Donald Trump on Friday, asserting that his recent executive order to terminate federal funding for PBS represents an unconstitutional effort to influence public media. The lawsuit, filed in a Washington, D.C. federal court, objects to the administration’s directive and underscores the gravity of losing federal support, stating it would “upend public television” across the country.
PBS, joined by a Minnesota public TV station as a co-plaintiff, contends that Trump's order infringes on the First Amendment by effectively enabling the president to become the “arbiter” of broadcast content. The complaint accuses the administration of targeting PBS specifically because of dissatisfaction with its programming, describing the move as “blatant viewpoint discrimination.” According to the suit, the order—issued on May 1—seeks to halt the distribution of funds from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) to both PBS and NPR, two of the nation's largest public media outlets.
In practical terms, the stakes are high for PBS, which estimates it receives approximately 16 percent of its $373.4 million annual budget from the CPB. The ripple effect would be even larger for local member stations, PBS warns, since these outlets contribute to 61 percent of the network’s revenue through dues—a share that includes millions in federal dollars funneled through the CPB. The loss of these funds could threaten the survival of smaller stations, especially those serving rural or underserved communities.
Responding to the lawsuit, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields defended the administration's action, claiming public broadcasters have used taxpayer resources to “support a particular political party.” As a result, the White House argues, the funding cuts represent a lawful and necessary step to ensure neutrality in publicly funded media.
NPR, which is also targeted by the order, has initiated a separate legal challenge this week seeking to block the implementation of the funding ban. Both PBS and NPR maintain their programming is independent and vital for informing and educating the American public, warning that the executive order threatens an essential pillar of non-commercial media.
As the lawsuits proceed, the future of federal support for public broadcasting hangs in the balance, raising questions about the boundaries of executive power and the enduring value of free and independent media in American democracy.